All case studies
Technical SEOSite Speed

Super Clear Contents: Mobile PageSpeed 28 to 85 with Technical SEO and Site Speed Overhaul

How I fixed 91 missing alt tags, 77 meta descriptions, and severe Core Web Vitals issues to push Super Clear Contents' mobile score from 28 to 85+.

Super Clear Contents site speed before and after PageSpeed scores

Super Clear Contents is a content-focused website that had built up a solid library of articles but was being held back by serious performance and SEO structural problems. When I audited the site, it had a mobile PageSpeed score of 28 out of 100, Core Web Vitals that were well outside Google’s recommended thresholds, and dozens of on-page SEO gaps that were suppressing visibility and click-through rates.

The challenge

The initial audit using PageSpeed Insights (mobile) and SEMrush revealed two overlapping sets of problems.

Performance (PageSpeed Insights, mobile):

  • Performance score: 28/100
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP): 3.4s
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): 7.9s
  • Time to Interactive (TTI): 9.5s
  • Total Blocking Time: 1,060ms
  • Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS): 0 (already clean)

SEO structure (SEMrush site audit):

  • 91 images missing alt attributes
  • 77 pages missing meta descriptions
  • 65 pages with a low text-to-HTML ratio
  • 2 pages with thin content
  • 2 internal links with nofollow applied unnecessarily
  • 1 page with an excessively long title tag
  • Sitemap and robots.txt were misaligned

What I did

Technical SEO fixes

  1. Added alt attributes to all 91 images to fix accessibility and image indexing gaps.
  2. Wrote and optimized meta descriptions for all 77 affected pages to improve click-through rates in search results.
  3. Improved content depth on thin pages and adjusted the text-to-HTML ratio across 65 pages to strengthen topical relevance signals.
  4. Removed unnecessary nofollow attributes from internal links and cleaned up the internal linking structure.
  5. Optimized the long title tag for clarity and keyword targeting.
  6. Updated sitemap.xml and brought it into alignment with robots.txt so crawlers could reach all key pages without conflicting instructions.

Speed and performance optimization

  1. Eliminated render-blocking resources by deferring non-critical JavaScript.
  2. Converted images to next-gen formats (WebP and AVIF) and applied lazy loading.
  3. Removed unused CSS and JavaScript, then minified all remaining assets.
  4. Fixed browser caching for 37 static assets that were flagged in the audit.
  5. Reduced main-thread blocking time by optimizing third-party script loading.
  6. Deployed a CDN for a global performance improvement.
  7. Applied critical CSS loading and async JavaScript execution to speed up initial render.

Results

PageSpeed Insights (mobile), before and after:

MetricBeforeAfter
Performance score28/10085+/100
First Contentful Paint3.4s1.5s
Largest Contentful Paint7.9s2.3s
Time to Interactive9.5s3.0s
Total Blocking Time1,060ms<150ms
Cumulative Layout Shift00

Additional outcomes within 2 months:

  • Bounce rate reduced by approximately 30% as a direct result of faster load times.
  • Organic impressions increased by approximately 45%.
  • Meta descriptions now present across all key pages, improving CTR in SERPs.
  • Alt text optimization enabled better image indexing in Google Images.
  • Sitemap and robots.txt fixes allowed faster crawling and indexing of the full site.
  • The site was prepared for Google’s Core Web Vitals ranking factor updates.

Why it worked

  • Starting from a score of 28 meant almost every standard performance fix produced a measurable gain. The LCP improvement from 7.9s to 2.3s alone brought the site within Google’s “good” threshold.
  • Fixing 91 missing alt attributes and 77 missing meta descriptions in one pass removed a wide layer of indexing and CTR friction simultaneously.
  • CDN deployment combined with browser caching resolved the static asset warnings that were adding unnecessary load time for returning visitors.
  • Aligning the sitemap and robots.txt ensured Google could actually reach and index the content that the performance improvements were making faster to load.
Have questions?
Let's talk about your growth.
Let's talk